Notice of Hearing: In the Matter of Alexander Christ Doulis (aka Alexander Christos Doulis, aka Alexandros Christodoulidis) and Liberty Consulting Ltd.

IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT,
R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5 AS AMENDED

- AND -

ALEXANDER CHRIST DOULIS
(aka ALEXANDER CHRISTOS DOULIS,
aka ALEXANDROS CHRISTODOULIDIS)
and LIBERTY CONSULTING LTD.

NOTICE OF HEARING
(Sections 127 and 127.1 of the Securities Act)

TAKE NOTICE THAT the Ontario Securities Commission (the “Commission”) will hold a hearing pursuant to sections 127 and 127.1 of the Securities Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, as amended (the “Act”) at the offices of the Commission located at 20 Queen Street West, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 3S8, 17th Floor, commencing on October 7, 2014 at 3:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the Hearing can be held;

TO CONSIDER whether it is in the public interest for the Commission, at the conclusion of the hearing, to make an order for sanctions and costs;

BY REASON OF the findings of the Commission in the Reasons and Decision issued on September 18, 2014 with respect to the hearing on the merits on this matter;

AND TAKE FURTHER NOTICE THAT the hearing will be conducted by way of an electronic hearing where only the Panel will participate via teleconference, as defined in section 1.1 of the Rules and subsection 1(1) of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act, RSO 1990, c S 22 as amended (the “SPPA”), unless a party objects as provided under subsection 5.2(2) of the SPPA;

AND TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that a party who objects to the hearing on sanctions and costs being conducted by way of an electronic hearing where only the Panel will participate via teleconference, shall file and serve a notice of objection setting out the reasons for the objection within 5 days after receiving this notice of electronic hearing;

AND TAKE FURTHER NOTICE  that the notice of objection shall set out the reasons for the objection and be accompanied by any evidence and any law relied on in support of the objection satisfying the Panel that holding an electronic hearing by teleconference rather than an oral hearing is likely to cause the party significant prejudice; and

AND TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that any party to the proceedings may be represented by counsel at the hearing;

AND TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that upon failure of any party to attend at the time and place aforesaid, or upon failure by any party to file and serve a notice of objection that holding the hearing on sanctions and costs by way of an electronic hearing by teleconference is likely to cause the party significant prejudice, the hearing may proceed in the absence of that party, and such party is not entitled to any further notice of the proceeding.

DATED at Toronto this 18th day of September, 2014